From ash@mailbox.neosoft.com Tue Sep 17 23:38:58 1996 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 01:29:41 -0500 (CDT) From: "Evan R. Jones"To: pasha90@gonzo.wolfenet.com Subject: Big Black ok.... ----------------------- Guitar World April 1996 This was a sub-article included with an article on Bad Religion entitled Dead Or Alive? Taking The Pulse Of The Nineties Punk Revival. The article is basically a debate by a few of the old school big wigs (Tesco Vee, Brian Baker, Dr. Frank, Dave Smiley, Gerard Cosloy, and of course, Steve Albini) about today's punk rock (or so-called "punk rock"). I have cut out the other parts and left only the relevant Albini tidbits, as Pasha would have cut them out anyway. Enjoy! ____________________________________________________________________________ Vee speaks from the standpoint of someone who lives a life of self-enforced obscurity. He has seen former friends like Glenn Danzig and Henry Rollins go on to fame and fortune while he still holds a day job. Steve Albini is a different story. In the eighties he and his band, Big Black, set the standard for guitar-based sonic aggression; in the nineties his brilliant work as a sound engineer defined a studio approach that was raw yet nuanced, and captured the essence of a band playing live. His talents have attracted clients like Nirvana and the Jesus Lizard, and earned him the reputation as the world's leading "punk producer." He hates the title. Asked to assess the state of punk, the sharp-tongued Albini replies, "In the seventies, 'punk' was used to describe a diverse group of bands that included the Ramones, Devo and Wire. They didn't have anything to do with each other stylistically, but shared a perverse internal aesthetic. Today, 'punk' means the stylistically unified sound of bands that play frat music." Albini view the "evolution" of punk as a natural process of cultural co-optation. It's occured before, and will likely occur again. "When an underground movement can be reduced to style and a few basic elements that can be imitated," he explains, "it has a much better potential for mass cultural penetration. It doesn't broaden anyone's tastes, however, because the mainstream encourages herd behavior, and once something is assimilated into mass culture it makes trivial anything which anyone does in that style in the future." Perhaps the most on-target assessment of the true implications of punk's rise and fall is offered by Steve Albini: "What was inspirational about punk was that it proverd you didn't need a hall pass into the world of serious culture. You could do anything you wanted in your basement or garage and it was as valid as anything that anybody else was doing. This 'Do It Yourself' ideology is so intuitively right that you have to be amazed that it took so long to take hold in broad cultural terms. Today we are seeing a dissolution of that ideology and an abdication of power into the hands of the mainstream, and that is the pity of the whole thing - not that some band is now popular that isn't stylistically worth it." ----- Evan Jones: Ash@neosoft.com Walking naked in the lions den/I know I'm gonna bleed again "I suck, go home." -Bob Mould